This folder contains the Supplemental Materials for AUTHOR (2019) "Phonological Effects in Sentence Formation".  The following materials are included.

1. Of the 14 text corpora employed, just the 8 literature corpora, taken from the restriction-free Project Gutenberg. All others are copyright-protected.

2. The spreadsheet 2_JustifyingTheConstraintsWord-Internally.xls; see section 2 of paper.

3. Sample spreadsheet (counts from Austen, "Simple" condition), showing how the full set of possible bigrams is reduced to a taxonomy of 38,016 cases, as in section 5.1. See 3_AustenSimpleBigramsReducedTo38016Cases.xlsx.

4a, 4b. Demonstration (from a schematic examples) that reducing the full bigram set to the taxonomy of violations profiles yields the same constraint weights (section 5.1) and significance values (section 5.4) as analyzing the full set.  See files 4a_JustifyPoolingOfCandidatesReadMe.pdf and 4b_JustifyPoolingOfCandidates.xlsx.

5. Complete set of constraint weights, log likelihood values, and p-values.  File name:  5_ConstraintWeights_LogLikelihoodValues_PValues.xlsx.

6. Same, but for a dictionary whose entries have been edited to remove coda /r/. File name:  6_ConstraintWeights_RhoticVsNonRhotic.xlsx.

7. The calculations discussed in section 5.2, "How the system works:  an intuitive example". File name:  7_SimpleExampleOfConstraintInteraction_Hiatus.xlsx.

8. Computations for the t-tests comparing the various conditions of analysis.  File name:  8_T-testsComparingConditions.xlsx.

9. The English phonetic dictionary we used (edited version of Carnegie-Mellon Dictionary).  File name:  9_BreissHayesDictionary.txt.






