Results of Applying Recursive Constraint Demotion to JohoreMalayClassVersion.txt


4-18-2019, 2:47 p.m.

OTSoft 2.5, release date 1/17/2017


1. Result

A ranking was found that generates the correct outputs.

   Stratum #1
      *[+nas][-nas -cons -glottal]              *[+nas][-nas -cons -glottal]
      Id nas in stops                           Id nas in stops
   Stratum #2
      *nas V                                    *nas V
      *nas w                                    *nas w

2. Tableaux


/ana/: 
     *[+nas][-nas -cons -glottal]Id nas in stops|*nas w*nas V
>anA                                            |        1   
 AnA                                            |        2!  
 ada                                   1!       |            
 ana              1!                            |            
 Ana              1!                            |        1   


/anawa/: 
       *[+nas][-nas -cons -glottal]Id nas in stops|*nas w*nas V
>anAWA                                            |  1     2   
 anAwa              1!                            |        1   
 anAWa              1!                            |  1     1   


/anapa/: 
       *[+nas][-nas -cons -glottal]Id nas in stops|*nas w*nas V
>anApa                                            |        1   
 anAPA                                   1!       |        2   
 anapa              1!                            |            
 anApA              1!                            |        2   


/A/: 
   *[+nas][-nas -cons -glottal]Id nas in stops|*nas w*nas V
>a                                            |            
 A                                            |        1!  


/Ana/: 
     *[+nas][-nas -cons -glottal]Id nas in stops|*nas w*nas V
>anA                                            |        1   
 AnA                                            |        2!  
 Ana              1!                            |        1   


/aW/: 
    *[+nas][-nas -cons -glottal]Id nas in stops|*nas w*nas V
>aw                                            |            
 aW                                            |  1!        
 AW                                            |  1!    1   


3. Status of Proposed Constraints:  Necessary or Unnecessary

   *[+nas][-nas -cons -glottal]  Necessary
   *nas V                        Necessary
   *nas w                        Necessary
   Id nas in stops               Necessary


4. Ranking Arguments, based on the Fusional Reduction Algorithm

This run sought to obtain the Most Informative Basis, intended to minimize the set of final ranking arguments.



The final rankings obtained are as follows:

      Id nas in stops >> *nas V
      *[+nas][-nas -cons -glottal] >> { *nas V, *nas w }


5. Mini-Tableaux

The following small tableaux may be useful in presenting ranking arguments. 
They include all winner-rival comparisons in which there is just one 
winner-preferring constraint and at least one loser-preferring constraint.  
Constraints not violated by either candidate are omitted.


/ana/: 
     *[+nas][-nas -cons -glottal]|*nas V
>anA                             |  1   
 ana              1              |      


/ana/: 
     Id nas in stops|*nas V
>anA                |  1   
 ada       1        |      


/anawa/: 
       *[+nas][-nas -cons -glottal]|*nas V*nas w
>anAWA                             |  2     1   
 anAwa              1              |  1         


/anawa/: 
       *[+nas][-nas -cons -glottal]|*nas V*nas w
>anAWA                             |  2     1   
 anAWa              1              |  1     1   


/anapa/: 
       *[+nas][-nas -cons -glottal]|*nas V
>anApa                             |  1   
 anapa              1              |      

