4-01-2019, 11:52 a.m.
OTSoft 2.5, release date 1/17/2017
1. Result
A ranking was found that generates the correct outputs.
| Stratum | Constraint Name | Abbreviation |
| Stratum #1 | *A | *A |
|   | Id-OO(ATR) | Id-OO(ATR) |
| Stratum #2 | Agree | Agree |
| Stratum #3 | Id-IO(ATR) | Id-IO(ATR) |
|   | Id(IO)-ATR Initial | Id(IO)-ATR Initial |
2. Tableaux
| /i ] I/: | *A |
Id-OO(ATR) |
Agree |
Id-IO(ATR) | Id(IO)-ATR Initial |
| ☞ i ] i |
|
|
|
* |
|
| i ] I |
|
|
*! |
|
|
| I ] I |
|
*! |
* |
|
* |
| /a ] i/: | *A |
Id-OO(ATR) |
Agree |
Id-IO(ATR) | Id(IO)-ATR Initial |
| ☞ a ] I |
|
|
|
* |
|
| a ] i |
|
|
*! |
|
|
| A ] i |
*! |
* |
|
* |
* |
| /i ] a/: | *A |
Id-OO(ATR) |
Agree |
Id-IO(ATR) | Id(IO)-ATR Initial |
| ☞ i ] a |
|
|
* |
|
|
| I ] a |
|
*! |
|
* |
|
| i ] A |
*! |
|
|
* |
|
| /i ] a ] i/: | *A |
Id-OO(ATR) |
Agree |
Id-IO(ATR) | Id(IO)-ATR Initial |
| ☞ i ] a ] I |
|
|
* |
* |
|
| i ] a ] i |
|
|
**! |
|
|
| I ] a ] I |
|
*! |
|
** |
* |
| i ] A ] i |
*! |
|
|
* |
|
| /i a/: | *A |
Id-OO(ATR) |
Agree |
Id-IO(ATR) | Id(IO)-ATR Initial |
| ☞ I a |
|
|
|
* |
* |
| i a |
|
|
*! |
|
|
| i A |
*! |
|
|
* |
|
| /i I/: | *A |
Id-OO(ATR) |
Agree |
Id-IO(ATR) | Id(IO)-ATR Initial |
| ☞ i i |
|
|
|
* |
|
| I I |
|
|
|
* |
*! |
| i I |
|
|
*! |
|
|
3. Status of Proposed Constraints: Necessary or Unnecessary
| Constraint | Status |
| Agree | Necessary |
| *A | Necessary |
| Id-OO(ATR) | Necessary |
| Id(IO)-ATR Initial | Necessary |
| Id-IO(ATR) | Not necessary |
4. Ranking Arguments, based on the Fusional Reduction Algorithm
This run sought to obtain the Skeletal Basis, intended to keep each final ranking argument as pithy as possible.
Original set of ERCs
| Index | ERC | Reason |
| 1 | WeeLe | for /i ] I/, i ] i >> i ] I, a ] I >> a ] i, i ] a ] I >> i ] a ] i, i i >> i I |
| 2 | WeWLW | for /i ] I/, i ] i >> I ] I |
| 3 | LWeWe | for /i ] a/, i ] a >> i ] A |
| 4 | LeWWe | for /i ] a/, i ] a >> I ] a |
| 5 | LeWWW | for /i ] a ] i/, i ] a ] I >> I ] a ] I |
| 6 | LWeee | for /i ] a ] i/, i ] a ] I >> i ] A ] i |
| 7 | WeeLL | for /i a/, I a >> i a |
| 8 | eWeeL | for /i a/, I a >> i A |
Recursive ranking search
Recursive search has now reached this location in the search tree: 1
Fusion of this ERC set is: LWWLL
The following ERCs form the total information-loss residue:
| WeeLe |
| WeWLW |
| LWeWe |
| LeWWe |
| LeWWW |
| LWeee |
| WeeLL |
| eWeeL |
Fusion of total residue: LWWLL
Skeletal basis of the fusion: eWWee
eWWee has no L's, so it cannot be retained in the Skeletal Basis.
Recursive search has now reached this location in the search tree: 1, 2
Current set of ERCs is based on constraint #2, *A
Working with the following ERC set:
| WeeLe |
| WeWLW |
| LeWWe |
| LeWWW |
| WeeLL |
Fusion of this ERC set is: LeWLL
The following ERCs form the total information-loss residue:
| WeeLe |
| WeeLL |
Fusion of total residue: WeeLL
Skeletal basis of the fusion: LeWee
LeWee includes at least one L and thus is not entailed by WeeLL.
Thus it may be retained in the Skeletal Basis of ERCs.
Recursive search has now reached this location in the search tree: 1, 2, 3
Current set of ERCs is based on constraint #3, Id-OO(ATR)
Working with the following ERC set:
| WeeLe |
| WeeLL |
Fusion of this ERC set is: WeeLL
The following ERCs form the total information-loss residue:
WeeLL has a null residue and thus may be retained in the Skeletal Basis of ERCs.
Recursive search has now reached this location in the search tree: 1, 3
Current set of ERCs is based on constraint #3, Id-OO(ATR)
Working with the following ERC set:
| WeeLe |
| LWeWe |
| LWeee |
| WeeLL |
| eWeeL |
Fusion of this ERC set is: LWeLL
The following ERCs form the total information-loss residue:
| WeeLe |
| WeeLL |
Fusion of total residue: WeeLL
Skeletal basis of the fusion: LWeee
LWeee includes at least one L and thus is not entailed by WeeLL.
Thus it may be retained in the Skeletal Basis of ERCs.
([1, 3, 2] not novel so not checked)
5. Ranking argumentation: Final result
The following set of ERCs forms the Skeletal Basis for the ERC set as a whole, and thus encapsulates the available ranking information.
| LeWee | Must dominate these constraints |
| WeeLL | |
| LWeee |
The final rankings obtained are as follows:
| Id-OO(ATR) >> Agree | Must dominate these constraints |
| Agree >> { Id-IO(ATR), Id(IO)-ATR Initial } | |
| *A >> Agree |
6. Mini-Tableaux
The following small tableaux may be useful in presenting ranking arguments. They include all winner-rival comparisons in which there is just one winner-preferring constraint and at least one loser-preferring constraint. Constraints not violated by either candidate are omitted.
| /i ] I/: |
Agree |
Id-IO(ATR) |
| ☞ i ] i |
|
* |
| i ] I |
* |
|
| /a ] i/: |
Agree |
Id-IO(ATR) |
| ☞ a ] I |
|
* |
| a ] i |
* |
|
| /i ] a ] i/: |
Agree |
Id-IO(ATR) |
| ☞ i ] a ] I |
* |
* |
| i ] a ] i |
** |
|
| /i ] a ] i/: |
*A |
Agree |
Id-IO(ATR) |
| ☞ i ] a ] I |
|
* |
* |
| i ] A ] i |
* |
|
* |
| /i a/: |
Agree |
Id-IO(ATR) | Id(IO)-ATR Initial |
| ☞ I a |
|
* |
* |
| i a |
* |
|
|
| /i a/: |
*A |
Id-IO(ATR) | Id(IO)-ATR Initial |
| ☞ I a |
|
* |
* |
| i A |
* |
* |
|
| /i I/: |
Agree |
Id-IO(ATR) |
| ☞ i i |
|
* |
| i I |
* |
|